Typically, a trespass is a misdemeanor in Florida. Fla. Stat. 810.08 states:
(1) Whoever, without being authorized, licensed, or invited, willfully enters or remains in any structure or conveyance, or, having been authorized, licensed, or invited, is warned by the owner or lessee of the premises, or by a person authorized by the owner or lessee, to depart and refuses to do so, commits the offense of trespass in a structure or conveyance.
(2)(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, trespass in a structure or conveyance is a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(b) If there is a human being in the structure or conveyance at the time the offender trespassed, attempted to trespass, or was in the structure or conveyance, the trespass in a structure or conveyance is a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
However, if the person is armed during the trespass, it will be a third-degree felony.
Landlords Cannot Prevent Tenants from Inviting Guests
Sometimes, a landlord may not want a particular person to enter their property. However, a landlord cannot prevent a tenant from inviting guests of their choosing. Pascal v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 166a (Fla. 17th Cir. Ct. 2018). In Pascal, the landlord has authorized law enforcement to trespass Mr. Pascal and they had done so. However, the tenant, a Ms. Fisher, had invited Pascal onto her property. Law enforcement, without first determining whether Pascal had permission to be on the property, sought to detain Pascal and he fled into the residence. Law enforcement then entered the residence without permission and arrested Pascal for Trespass and Resisting an Officer Without Violence. The trial court denied motions for judgment of acquittal and Pascal was convicted.
On appeal, the Circuit Court reversed the convictions. The Court stated:
“One of the elements of the crime of trespass is “that defendant’s entering the property without permission.” See, L.D.L. v. State, 569 So. 2d 1310, 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). As such, in order to make an arrest for trespass, and most certainly in order to be found guilty of trespass, it was incumbent upon law enforcement to ensure that Appellant was not an invited guest. In this case, the uncontroverted testimony of the lessee, Ms. Fisher, was that she invited Appellant to her apartment on the date in question; that he was a guest of her’s. Additionally, her uncontroverted testimony included the fact that an officer on scene asked her if Appellant was her guest that day, and she told him that he was. This information should have been relayed to Detective Johnson and taken into consideration before he was arrested for trespass. Ms. Tatro, another resident of the apartment, also testified that Appellant was a guest at the apartment and that she told law enforcement that he was.
Even if the property owner did not want Appellant on the property, the tenant/lessee of the apartment has the right to invite that person over. As the uncontroverted testimony of Ms. Fisher and Ms. Tatro demonstrated that Appellant was a guest on their property, the motion for judgment of acquittal on the trespass charge should have been granted.
Additionally, as noted by the court in D.L. v. State, 87 So. 3d 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) [37 Fla. L. Weekly D1162a], where the State conceded that it failed to show sufficient evidence that a defendant was trespassing, it “. . . thus failed to show that the officers were engaged in the lawful execution of their duties when they detained him to investigate the charge.” Id. at 825. As such, and as conceded by Appellee, the motion for judgment of acquittal on the resisting without violence charge should also have been granted. Before chasing Appellant into the residence (with the Detective entering through a window) and arresting him for trespass, Detective Johnson should have first attempted to make contact with the tenants of the residence to investigate and determine whether Appellant was or was not a guest/invitee. He did not do so, did not learn that Appellant was in fact a guest, and in not properly investigating before making the arrest, ended up making an improper arrest.”
The Bantner Firm Can Fight Your Trespass Arrest!
Because Adam Bantner has dedicated his career to fighting for those accused of crimes, he has the necessary expertise to fight your trespass charge. Give us a call at 813.397.3965 to set up your free consultation today!
Adam Bantner – Criminal Defense Attorney at Law
If you are in need of an expert criminal defense attorney specializing in legal defense against DUI, traffic, criminal, violent crime charges, or a personal injury – you’ll find it here.
Adam L. Bantner, II is a Board Certified Criminal TrialAttorney representing those accused of crimes in Hillsborough and Polk counties. He is the Past President of the Hillsborough County Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys., is a Super Lawyers Rising Star, and AVVO rated “Superb.” Adam is a member of Valrico Law Group.
Request a Consultation
Adam Bantner, II is a Board Certified Criminal Trial Law Attorney representing those accused of crimes in Hillsborough and Polk Counties. When you are facing criminal charges, you want an expert in your corner. The Florida Bar has recognized Adam as an expert criminal defense attorney.
I have been defending the accused since 2006 and am Past President of the Hillsborough County Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys.
I have tried over 30 jury trials, on charges ranging from driving on a suspended license to murder.
In addition, I am a Brandon personal injury attorney. If you’ve been injured through no fault of your own, give me a call to see how we can help!
I approach each case on the principle that every client deserves zealous representation, with attention to detail and to their individualized needs. My mission is to get the best possible result for every client, in every case, every time. Give me a call to see how I can assist you to get the best results in your case. I are here to help.